USPTO serial 85422355
DRAGON SUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRAGON SUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seattle, WA
Seattle, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D.C. Peter Chu
DC PETER CHU CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PL1420 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the management and visualization of personal scheduling and contact management, software for customizing visualization of user profile information; software for customizing visualization of videos; software for customizing visualization of images; software for customizing visualization of information management, spreadsheets, tables, graphs, charts, word processing, presentations, electronic mail, instant messages, calendar, meeting scheduling, desktop publishing, project management, customer management, business planning, direct mail, business financial management, on-line document collaboration, and storage; software for customizing visualization of a three dimensional model; software for customizing visualization based on a user's biometrics | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for customizing information displayed to users on a global computer network; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of user interface; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in the field of user interface; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for customizing information displayed to users over the internet and online sources for user interface customization; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for distributing pieces of shared, concurrently accessed non-downloadable temporary-use software for customizing visualization of electronic mail contents; software for the management and visualization of personal scheduling and contact management | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |