USPTO serial 85427928
VISIUSMATRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4771049Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 2015
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VISIUSMATRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnpeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnpeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnpeg, Manitoba, CA
RUE ROBERT STUMPER, LU
DEERFIELD IMAGING HOLDINGS, INC.
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David D'Zurilla
David D'Zurilla Schwegman Lundberg & WoessnerP.O. Box 2938Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | modular open architecture surgical suite information management system, namely, computer hardware and software for data management and used as an intraoperative system control platform that integrates with hospital surgical, interventional video and diagnostic video sources, permitting operators access to the system through a touch screen-based graphical user interface software that provides centralized control over video data routing and display, network video streaming and conferencing, digital recording and still image capture, audio communications, room lighting and device power management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMRIS Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IMRIS Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IMRIS Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DEERFIELD IMAGING S.À R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by DEERFIELD IMAGING HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VISIUSMATRIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |