Drawing for PARADIGM ONCOLOGY

USPTO serial 85434919

PARADIGM ONCOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARADIGM ONCOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr.

Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr. Pepper Hamilton LLPEighteenth & Arch Streets3000 Two Logan SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing medical testing services and information in the field of cancer research and disease classificationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 8, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 7, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 23, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 31, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance