Drawing for NATIONAL BEER PONG LEAGUE

USPTO serial 85453523

NATIONAL BEER PONG LEAGUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATIONAL BEER PONG LEAGUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alain Villeneuve

ALAIN VILLENEUVE VEDDER PRICE, PC222 N LASALLE ST STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601-1104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing educational seminars, workshops, conferences, classes, programs, and training services, to members of a league in relation to beer pong league related matters; Entertainment services for players of beer pong in the nature of organizing and arranging beer pong exhibitions for entertainment purposes, conducting live beer pong games, and entertainment in the nature of beer pong tournaments; Arranging and conducting live and online competitions and tournaments, namely, beer pong games; Production of humorous videos for the Internet featuring the game of beer pong; production of television programs featuring clips in relation to the game of beer pong; Entertainment services, namely, the provision of continuing programs featuring beer pong games delivered by television, radio, satellite, the internet, and liveACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 30, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 20, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 8, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 13, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance