Drawing for CHOPRA MEDIA

USPTO serial 85459235

CHOPRA MEDIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOPRA MEDIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan D. Reichman, Esquire

JONATHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed matter and publications, namely, a series of books and written articles and brochures featuring information on yoga, physical fitness, meditation, nutrition, mental training, spirituality, inspiration, self-help, motivation and wellness, exploration of the subject of the wellness triadACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 24, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 23, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 23, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 14, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 2, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 20, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 26, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 12, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 12, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 12, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 12, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance