Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85459254?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85459254. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DEEPAK CHOPRA?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85459254, the listed owner(s) include: Deepak Chopra, LLC, CHOPRA, DEEPAK.

What is USPTO serial number 85459254?

Serial number 85459254 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DEEPAK CHOPRA. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover DEEPAK CHOPRA?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 85459254

DEEPAK CHOPRA

Q: What is the current status of DEEPAK CHOPRA?

DEEPAK CHOPRA (85459254) currently shows USPTO status code 654 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654

Filing date: Oct 28, 2011
Status date: Aug 6, 2026
Registration date: —
Examiner: PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEEPAK CHOPRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Deepak Chopra, LLC
Carlsbad, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Deepak Chopra, LLC
CHOPRA, DEEPAK
CARLSBAD, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by CHOPRA, DEEPAK

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.

JONATHAN D. REICHMAN, ESQ. KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Pre-recorded DVD's and CD's featuring audio and video recordings relating to yoga, physical fitness, meditation, nutrition, mental training, spirituality, inspiration, self-help, motivation, wellness and exploration of the subject of the triad of wellness; interactive video game programs; software featuring instructional information and guidance on subjects related to yoga, physical fitness, meditation, nutrition, mental training, spirituality, inspiration, self-help, motivation, wellness, and exploration of the subject of the triad of wellness	ACTIVE	Jan 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 6, 2026	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
May 30, 2026	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Nov 8, 2025	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Nov 7, 2025	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
May 6, 2025	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 10, 2025	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Oct 9, 2024	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Sep 10, 2024	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Dec 13, 2023	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Mar 22, 2023	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Aug 9, 2022	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Aug 9, 2022	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Aug 9, 2022	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jun 29, 2022	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Jun 13, 2022	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
May 18, 2022	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Oct 7, 2021	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Aug 18, 2021	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Feb 3, 2021	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Nov 24, 2020	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 28, 2020	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Oct 15, 2019	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Mar 28, 2019	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Sep 19, 2018	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Mar 15, 2018	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Sep 14, 2017	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Mar 2, 2017	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Aug 24, 2016	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Feb 18, 2016	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jul 31, 2015	AAUA	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED	—
Jul 30, 2015	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jul 30, 2015	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jul 30, 2015	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jul 30, 2015	IUAA	USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED	—
Jul 9, 2015	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 9, 2015	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 2, 2015	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2015	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2015	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2015	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2014	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Jan 30, 2014	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jul 7, 2013	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jul 7, 2013	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jul 7, 2013	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
May 20, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 20, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 20, 2013	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2013	GNR1	NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED	—
Apr 10, 2013	GNRU	DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED	—
Apr 10, 2013	AAUD	AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED	—
Apr 10, 2013	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 4, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 4, 2013	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2013	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Feb 15, 2013	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Feb 15, 2013	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
Sep 3, 2012	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2012	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 1, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 27, 2012	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 23, 2012	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2012	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2012	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2012	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2012	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 2, 2011	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Nov 1, 2011	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—