USPTO serial 85461400
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Traverse City, MI
Traverse City, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L. Carol
13561 S WEST BAY SHORE DRSTE 3000TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49684-6293| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing consulting, namely, Promoting the goods and services of others through social media investment traffic analysis and reporting; Development of marketing strategies, concepts and tactics, namely, audience development, brand awareness, online community building and digital word of mouth communications; Social media strategy and marketing consultancy focusing on helping clients create and extend their product and brand strategies by providing customized communication programs to obtain consumer insights and develop branding strategies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |