USPTO serial 85472959
PROVEN SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROVEN SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORTH CANTON, OH
NORTH CANTON, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Hrina
David J. Hrina Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLP3800 Embassy ParkwaySuite 300Akron, OH 44333Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Air conditioners; Air filters for air conditioning units; Air filters for domestic use; Air purifiers; Ceiling fans; Dehumidifiers; Electric fans; Electric space heaters; Evaporative air coolers; Filtering units for water filtering; Humidifiers; Refrigerating appliances and installations; Water filters; Water purifiers | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Alarm clocks; Bracelets; Clocks; Clocks incorporating radios; Collectible coins; Commemorative coins; Costume jewelry; Earrings; Jewelry; Necklaces; Non-monetary coins | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Abrasive pads for kitchen purposes; Bakeware; Beverage glassware; Bowls; Bread-cases; Chopping boards for kitchen use; Cleaning sponges; Containers for household or kitchen use; Cooking forks; Cooking graters; Cooking pots and pans; Cooking strainers; Cookware for use in microwave ovens; Cookware, namely, pots and pans; Cookware, namely, steamers; Cups; Dinnerware; Dishes and plates; Figurines of glass, ceramic, china, crystal, earthenware, porcelain, terra cotta; Household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Kitchen containers; Kitchen ladles; Kitchen urns; Kitchen utensil, namely, non-metal flexible lid designed for draining or pressing liquids from a food can; Kitchen utensils, namely, pouring and straining spouts; Kitchen utensils, namely, splatter screens; Ladles, for kitchen use; Metal sponges for household use; Mugs; Plates; Portable plastic containers for storing household and kitchen goods; Scouring sponges; Scrub sponges; Serving platters; Servingware for serving food and drinks; Souvenir plates; Sponges for household purposes; Toilet sponges; Wood chopping boards for kitchen use | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Action skill games; Action-type target games; Bags specially adapted for sports equipment; Balls for sports; Baseball bats; Baseball gloves; Baseballs; Basketballs; Board games; Bocce balls; Dumbbells; Equipment sold as a unit for playing action type target games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; Exercise machines; Exercise weights; Footballs; Golf bags; Golf balls; Golf clubs; Manually-operated exercise equipment; Nets for ball games; Nets for sports; Parlor games; Racquet ball rackets; Soccer balls; Sport balls; Tabletop games; Tennis balls; Tennis rackets; Volleyballs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCI DIRECT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SCI DIRECT, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PROVEN SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |