USPTO serial 85486419
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, bandanas; baby bibs not of paper; gloves; hooded shirts; infantwear; jackets; jerseys; loungewear; neckwear; pants; ponchos; scarves; shirts; shorts; skirts; sleepwear; socks; sweatpants; sweatshirts; t-shirts; tank tops; track pants; track suits; undergarments; vests; wind resistant jackets; belts; footwear; headwear | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |