Drawing for OFF LEASH

USPTO serial 85486420

OFF LEASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OFF LEASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juice; non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; fruit-based beverages; water beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 23, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 23, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 8, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 19, 2013RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Nov 22, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 17, 2013RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 17, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 22, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 22, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 13, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2011TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Dec 10, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance