USPTO serial 85488504
D'LISH PASTRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D'LISH PASTRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather Hendrix
HEATHER HENDRIX THE HENDRIX LAW OFFICE, PLLC70 S VAL VISTA DR STE A3-418GILBERT, AZ 85296-0930UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Almond cake; Apple turnovers; Bakery desserts; Biscotti; Bread and pastry; Cakes; Candy bars; Chocolate bars; Chocolate covered cookies; Cookie pies; Cookies; Crumpets; Cup cakes; Danish pastries; Dessert souffles; Frozen confections, namely, freezer bars; Fruit cakes; Fruit pies; Fruit turnovers; Granola-based snack bars; Ice cream desserts; Ice-cream cakes; Iced cakes; Japanese style steamed cakes (mushi-gashi); Macaroons; Macaroons; Moon cakes; Pastries; Pastries with fruit; Pastries, namely, pasties; Pastry; Pastry cream; Pastry mixes; Pastry shells; Petits fours; Pies; Plum-cakes; Scones; Sponge cakes; Vegan cakes; Vegan cookies; Vegan cup cakes; Vegan pies | ACTIVE | May 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |