USPTO serial 85498974
FLEXIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5003555Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2016
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLEXIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boulogne-Billancourt, FR
Boulogne-Billancourt, FR
Boulogne-Billancourt, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Kennedy
Paul J. Kennedy PEPPER HAMILTON LLP18th and Arch Streets3000 TWO LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus, namely, stoma and drainage bags for the collection of physiological or pathological secretions or excreta | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |