USPTO serial 85508804
RITLABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RITLABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alexandria, VA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing technical operating information, technical support and interactive technical support services relating to downloadable computer software, downloadable computer software, and software contained on digital media and other portable electronic memory for providing portable electronic storage, messaging and e-mail, encrypted and secured data management, and secure electronic data transmission; providing research and development of computer software in the field of mobile applications; providing computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; creating of computer programs; and creating, maintaining and modernizing computer software, operating systems, database systems, and web applications | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |