USPTO serial 85532818
THE BENTLEY BOYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BENTLEY BOYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Cohen
Michael N. Cohen Cohen IP Law Group P.C.9025 Wilshire Blvd. Suite #301Beverly Hills, CA 90211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Body jewelry; Bracelets; Brooches; Cameos; Cases for clock and watch-making; Cases for watches and clocks; Charms; Charms for collar jewelry and bracelet; Clock and watch hands; Clocks and watches; Complication watches; Costume jewelry; Diamond jewelry; Diving watches; Dress watches; Equestrian watches; Gemstone jewelry; Gold thread jewelry; Hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair; Inexpensive non-jewelry watches; Ivory jewelry; Jewellery and watches; Jewellery, clocks and watches; Jewelry; Jewelry and imitation jewelry; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry boxes not of metal; Jewelry boxes of metal; Jewelry boxes of precious metal; Jewelry brooches; Jewelry cases; Jewelry cases not of precious metal; Jewelry cases of precious metal; Jewelry chains; Jewelry dishes; Jewelry for attachment to clothing; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry in the nature of armbands; Jewelry organizers; Jewelry pins for use on hats; Jewelry ring holders; Jewelry stickpins; Jewelry to be affixed to bikinis; Jewelry watches; Jewelry, namely, amulets; Jewelry, namely, anklets; Jewelry, namely, arm cuffs; Jewelry, namely, crosses; Jewelry, namely, dog tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes; Lapel pins; Mechanical and automatic watches; Musical jewelry boxes; Ornaments of precious metal in the nature of jewelry; Parts for watches; Pins being jewelry; Pocket watches; Precious stones and watches; Rings; Rings being jewelry; Sports watches; Stainless steel jewelry bracelets; Stop watches; Watch bands; Watch bands and straps; Watch boxes; Watch bracelets; Watch cases; Watch pouches; Watch straps; Watch straps made of metal or leather or plastic; Watches; Watches and clocks; Watches and jewellery; Watches and jewelry; Watches and straps for watches; Watches for outdoor use; Watches for sporting use; Watches made of precious metals or coated therewith; Watches, clocks; Watches, clocks, jewellery and imitation jewellery; Watches, clocks, jewelry and imitation jewelry; Women's jewelry; Women's watches; Wrist watches | ACTIVE | Nov 17, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |