Drawing for BE FIRST

USPTO serial 85533582

BE FIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE FIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendy E. Miller

WENDY E. MILLER COOPER & DUNHAM LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 20NEW YORK, NY 10112-0077UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an on-line computer database featuring news in the field of businessACTIVE—
036Providing an on-line computer database featuring news in the fields of financial markets and financeACTIVE—
041Providing an Internet news portal featuring links to news stories and articles in the field of current events; Providing an on-line computer database in the field of current events newsACTIVE—
042providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for accessing and downloading news articles; providing a web site featuring technology which enables access, purchase and sale of news information and articles; providing a website featuring technology which enables users to establish and manage accounts for offering and selling news articles and information; providing a website featuring technology which calculates a price for news information; providing a website featuring technology which processes and analyzes real-time dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 20, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 14, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 9, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 31, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 12, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 11, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 4, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 21, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance