Drawing for MIMU

USPTO serial 85549737

MIMU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIMU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Lieberman

JOAN LIEBERMAN TOBIAS PIENIEK, P.C.1 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 295CARLE PLACE, NY 11514-1827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, lip gloss and lip shimmer, nail polish, bath oils, bath and shower gels; bubble bath; bath crystals; bath grains, namely, bath beads; bath salts; soaps; body scrubs; body massage oils; body butter and fragrance sprays for the body; and fitted children's vanity cases containing cosmeticsABANDONED—
009Prerecorded computer interactive media, namely, computer programs featuring animated human and animal characters; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for use in relation to digital animation and special effects of images featuring animated human and animal characters; pre-recorded digital media featuring webisodes featuring animated human and animal characters; interactive multimedia entertainment software for creating and editing music, text, images, animation and/or interactive gamesABANDONED—
028Games, namely, board games; toys, namely, molded toy figures, stuffed toys and plush toys, dolls and doll accessoriesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2013MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2013ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 29, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance