Drawing for CONECTO

USPTO serial 85572998

CONECTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOLACZ, KATHLEEN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONECTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jose Maria Arrufat Gracia

JOSE MARIA ARRUFAT GRACIA ARRUFAT GRACIA, PLLC130 W 42ND ST STE 705NEW YORK, NY 10036-7804UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Provision of search engines for the internet; creating and maintaining websites for third parties; computer software rental; computer software maintenance, development and design; information technology consultation; development of information technology for others in the field of training and human capital development; information technology services, namely, software development and design for use in human resources departments in corporations, public administration and training companiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance