Drawing for BIG DOG

USPTO serial 85576833

BIG DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles J. Meyer

CHARLES J. MEYER WOODARD, EMHARDT, MORIARTY, MCNETT & HENRY LLP111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009automotive measuring instruments, namely, water temperature gauges, oil pressure gauges, oil temperature gauges, fuel pressure gauges, brake pressure gauges, and engine RPM gauges ordered through specialty street rod product ordering servicesACTIVE—
012braking systems for vehicles and parts thereof, namely, master cylinder, pedals, pads, discs, calipers, rotors, drums, shoes, spindles, and hubs; land vehicle suspension components, namely, axles, springs, shocks, radius rods, panhard bars, kingpins, universal joints, cross-members, independent front suspensions, rear axle housings, ring and pinion sets; land vehicle radiator components, namely, radiators, cores, shells, fans, hoses, and overflow tanks; dash panels; land vehicle firewall covers, all of the foregoing ordered through specialty street rod product ordering servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2013ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance