USPTO serial 85577137
CARIBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARIBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maracay, Edo. Aragua, VE
Maracay, Edo. Aragua, VE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BHARATI BAKSHANI
BHARATI BAKSHANI LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018-3703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | filler paper, envelopes, kraft paper, paper mail pouches, note books, writing pads, sketch pads, art pads, drawing pads, legal pads, note pads, composition books, writing tablets, memo pads, paper, copy paper, graph paper, printing paper, memo paper, poster board, typing paper, stationery, stationery writing paper and envelopes, and printing block | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2016 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |