Drawing for SOLIDIFLY

USPTO serial 85580570

SOLIDIFLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLIDIFLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew H. Swyers

MATTHEW H SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY344 MAPLE AVE WSTE 151VIENNA, VA 22180-5612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Storage of fly ash used as a coagulant in oil well drilling operationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 24, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 24, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 9, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 22, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 2, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 2, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 20, 2013RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Feb 20, 2013RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2013RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jan 31, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 2, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2013CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 12, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 10, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 10, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 9, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance