USPTO serial 85590971
KYOCERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KYOCERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, JP
Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No: 29,418
Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No: 29,418 CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical, dental or veterinary use; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; medical instruments, namely, orthopedic articles and instruments; orthopedic devices for diagnostic and therapeutic use; medical machines, apparatus and instruments, namely, blood collecting device, injection syringes, syringe barrels, injection needles, kit form consisting primarily of syringe, sealing cap, needle guides and butterfly needles for use in collecting blood components from patients' blood; dental machines, apparatus and instruments, namely, dental CT equipment, power tools for dental surgical use, instruments for fitting dental implants; surgical apparatus and instruments; medical instruments, namely, orthopedic apparatus and instruments; medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; apparatus and instruments for neurosurgical operation; artificial bones for implantation; prosthetic and filling materials, namely, artificial materials for use in the replacement of bones; bone void fillers consisting of artificial materials; artificial bone growth media; artificial bone parts to be implanted in natural bones; medical, surgical and orthopedic implants made of artificial materials; dental implants; artificial joint implants and their parts for orthopedic surgery; orthopedic joint implants; sockets, cups, heads, screws, plates, trays, femoral components and tibial components, all for use as parts of artificial joint implants for orthopedic surgery; artificial joints; implants of artificial materials, namely, total hip replacement, total knee prosthesis, artificial cranial components, total shoulder joint replacements, total ankle joint replacements, total elbow joint replacements, artificial vertebral bodies, artificial patella; artificial dental roots; spine fixation devices used for spinal disc repair and vertebral body repair; bone fixation plates of artificial materials; medical devices, namely, infusion pumps for delivering measured amounts of solutions into the bloodstream over time; centrifugal blood pumps; medical apparatus, namely, blood pump system for use in artificial liver support; artificial patella parts to be implanted in natural bones; knee joint implants and their parts for orthopedic surgery made of artificial materials; apparatus and instruments for orthopedic knee surgery; prosthetic or filling materials not for dental use, namely, artificial materials for use in the replacement of bones; prosthetic and filling materials not for dental use, namely, putty for use in the replacement of bones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |