Drawing for SNAPSHOT SERVICES API

USPTO serial 85599056

SNAPSHOT SERVICES API

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNAPSHOT SERVICES API?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Pickerill

JOHN PICKERILL FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services, namely, supply chain logistics services for capturing data from product codes, analyzing and verifying data, communicating captured information and generating reportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2014MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jun 18, 2014ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Feb 14, 2014IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Feb 9, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 16, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 16, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 23, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance