USPTO serial 85658421
Serial No. 85658421
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 85658421?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services, namely, providing voice over Internet protocol (VOIP)peer-to-peer communications, providing voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) with PSTN termination by an existing PBX, third party hosted PBX or centrex service or other termination service, text wireless digital messaging services, Instant Messaging services, transmission of video, sound, and information, including location information, and other communications services, namely, VOIP services for sensing and providing user presence information; telecommunications services, namely, transmission of audio, video, images, text and other data by means of a broadband, copper, optical, or wireless communications networks; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data among users of computers; telephone communications; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by mobile telephone; internet telephony services; electronic messaging services; wireless digital messaging services; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; instant messaging services; video messaging services; text messaging services; electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals and messages; simple message service (SMS) and multimedia message service (MMS) via telecommunications and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) services featuring software in the fields of VOIP communication services, web-based conferencing, audio conferencing, electronic messaging, video conferencing, and voice and call processing; application service provider (ASP) services featuring software in the fields of VOIP communication services, namely, VOIP communications services for sensing and providing user presence information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 9, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |