Drawing for BEAT THE PRO, MEET THE PRO

USPTO serial 85659352

BEAT THE PRO, MEET THE PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAT THE PRO, MEET THE PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan O. Owens

JONATHAN O OWENS HAVERSTOCK & OWENS LLP162 N WOLFE RDSUNNYVALE, CA 94086-5211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services, namely, providing community entertainment programs featuring unique sporting activities, sporting contests, cultural activities and recreation activitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 26, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 23, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 18, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 20, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 24, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 29, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 15, 2013EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Jun 3, 2013RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
May 10, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 10, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 28, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 19, 2013RDX2ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED—
Feb 18, 2013RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jan 24, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance