USPTO serial 85660589
EVOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4706085Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2015
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KWEI-SHAN DIST., TAOYUAN CITY, TW
Sandvik Intellectual Property AB
Sandviken, SE
Sandvik Intellectual Property AB
Sandviken, SE
Sandvik Intellectual Property AB
Sandviken, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R Haarz
ARMOR STEEL CO LTDNO 10 LANE 290 NANSHANG RDKWEI-SHAN DIST TAOYUAN CITY, 33392TAIWANGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine die cutting tools, namely, steel rule dies; machine tools, namely, rotary knives for die cutting; power saw blades | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, knives, hand-operated die cutting knives, steel rule dies for die cutting, and saws | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARMOR STEEL CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Sandvik Intellectual Property AB
- Other trademarks owned by Sandvik Intellectual Property AB
- Other trademarks owned by Sandvik Intellectual Property AB
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named EVOFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2018 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 16, 2018 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2018 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| May 5, 2014 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |