Drawing for BRAG CLIP

USPTO serial 85668613

BRAG CLIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERNS, LEE ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAG CLIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton

ROSEMARY S. TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET ST FL 30SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital video recorders; software and hardware for recording and playback of audio, video, animation and 3D sequences for use in the fields of entertainment, education, advertising, science, business, record-keeping and archiving; audio and video recordings featuring entertainment and educational subjects, namely, films, music, television programs, documentaries, news, comedy, variety shows, cartoons, video games, drama, general education, technology, science, history, pre-school, mathematics, biology, art, nature studies, and social studies instruction, and featuring virtual playback controls, virtual interactive 3D navigation controls, and virtual editing controls with copying capability, namely, sound and video recording virtual playback buttons for use in playback of audio and video recordings and sold together as a unit therewith; computers; set-top boxes and adapters for use with televisions, with monitors and with portable electronic devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 23, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 31, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 28, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance