Drawing for MERCHANT

USPTO serial 85699279

MERCHANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERCHANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen G. Janoski

Stephen G. Janoski Butzel Long1909 K Street, N.W., Suite 500Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Administrative hotel management; Business management of hotels for others; Hotel management for others; Managing and operating resort hotels and business conference centers of othersACTIVE—
043Hotel accommodation services; Hotel services; Providing extended-stay hotels; Resort hotel servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 5, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 20, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance