Drawing for XPANDED REALITY

USPTO serial 85706654

XPANDED REALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XPANDED REALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. Russell Cox

C. RUSSELL COX COX, SARGEANT & BURNS, P.C.8440 WOODFIELD CROSSING BLVD STE 170INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240-4300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software focusing on achieving a set of goals, positions, ownership, and credentials, and professional and social status, and good fortune necessary to succeed professionally and personally, and not referring either to a group of software for use in commerce or to a group of offices; Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; Computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; Computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfacesACTIVE—
041Augmented reality video production; Continuing public service programs in the field of Augmented reality produced and distributed over television, satellite, film, audio, video, internet, and 3-D virtual reality mediaACTIVE—
042Computer programming services for creating augmented reality videos and games; Computer software development; Computer software development in the field of mobile applications; Computer software development in the field of including but not limited to entertainment, banking, small business for others; Developing customized software for others; Software development for others in the field of software configuration managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 25, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance