USPTO serial 85712813
ACE ELECTRONIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACE ELECTRONIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farhad Novian, Esq.
FARHAD NOVIAN NOVIAN & NOVIAN LLP1801 CENTURY PARK ESTE 1201LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail store services in the field of home audio/video, car audio/video, home appliances, beauty supplies, auto parts and accessories, general merchandise, cellphone accessories, and electronics | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |