CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LUM

USPTO serial 85736612

LUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly B. Markley (P54187)

MOLLY B. MARKLEY (P54187) YOUNG BASILE HANLON & MACFARLANE P.C.3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers, namely, software for use by consumers to document their shopping experiences by allowing consumers to take pictures, write comments, specify location and share their pictures, location and comments with othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 29, 2014IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
May 29, 2014FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 19, 2014INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
May 2, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 10, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 10, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance