USPTO serial 85755978
AEROLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEROLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William O. Ferron, Jr.
William O. Ferron, Jr. Seed IP Law Group PLLC701 Fifth AvenueSuite 5400Seattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamins, minerals, caffeine for boosting energy, namely, caffeine preparations for stimulative use, nutritional supplements, nutritional supplements for boosting energy, dietary supplements, dietary supplements for boosting energy, and nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement, all in powder cartridge form for use with an aerosol dispenser | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Aerosol dispensers for medical purposes, sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Disposable aerosol dispensers, not for medical or therapeutic use, for use with food and beverage powder cartridges | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Pate, caviar, cocoa butter for food purposes, all in powder form contained in an aerosol dispenser; pate, caviar, cocoa butter for food purposes, all in powder cartridge form, for use with an aerosol dispenser; meat, fish, poultry, game, meat extracts, processed and dried fruits, processed and dried vegetables, milk, milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt, milk beverages, crustaceans, and cheese, all in powder form contained in an aerosol dispenser or in powder cartridge form for use with an aerosol dispenser | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, chocolate and flavored chocolate, white chocolate, spices, sugar, cookies, biscuits, cocoa-based beverages, milk products, namely, ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt, all in powder form contained in an aerosol dispenser or in powder cartridge form for use with an aerosol dispenser; food flavorings; coffee essences, and beverage flavorings in powder form contained in an aerosol dispenser or in powder cartridge form for use with an aerosol dispenser | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Alcoholic beverage flavored powders contained in an aerosol dispenser or in cartridge form for use with an aerosol dispenser, namely, nonalcoholic wine, nonalcoholic fortified wine, nonalcoholic champagne, nonalcoholic cordials and nonalcoholic cocktails; energy drinks in powder form, contained in an aerosol dispenser or in powder cartridge form for use with an aerosol dispenser; aerosolized products, namely, beverages in the nature of fruit beverages, carbonated beverages, vegetable beverages, and alcohol flavored beverages, all in powder form contained in an aerosol dispenser or in powder cartridge form for use with an aerosol dispenser; beverage essences in powder form contained in an aerosol dispenser or in powder cartridge form for use with an aerosol dispenser | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AeroDesigns, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AeroDesigns, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named AEROLIFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2014 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |