Drawing for Serial No. 85799986

USPTO serial 85799986

Serial No. 85799986

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85799986?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric R. Moran

ERIC R. MORAN MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP300 S WACKER DR FL 31CHICAGO, IL 60606-6706UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Applications being computer game programs; computer game programs; computer game software; computer application software for mobile computing devices, namely, mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers for connecting the devices to networks; computer application software for mobile computing devices, namely, mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers for gaming; computer games software; computer games software for games of chance and casino-style gaming provided on-line; casino management software; computer casino management software enabling casino operators to manage on-line casino sites; computer software to enable end users to access and play games of chance and casino-style games from a computer database, computer network, global computer network, the Internet or by other electronic means; computer software to enable end users to track and audit their gaming accounts on-lineACTIVE—
035Business administration and management services; advertising and publicity services; marketing services; advising in the field of business administration and business management; remote business management via computer networks; consulting and advisory services in the fields of business administration and business management, publicity, and marketing; providing information on business administration and business management, publicity, and marketingACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, casino, gaming and gambling services; entertainment services, namely, providing games of chance and casino-style gaming services; games of chance and casino-style gaming services provided on-line via a computer networkACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; computer programming; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; computer consultancy services; design, drawing and commissioned writing for website content; building and maintaining websites; hosting websites on the Internet; computer software design services; computer software development in the field of software mobile applications; advice and consultancy in relation to computer software applications development; applications services provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; consultancy, advisory and information services relating to all of the aforesaid services consulting and advisory services in the field of computer hardware and software design; providing information on computer hardware and software designACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 18, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 29, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 29, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 21, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance