Drawing for SAL'S

USPTO serial 85809340

SAL'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAL'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Eichen

JEFFREY L EICHEN DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP222 DELAWARE AVENUESUITE 1410WILMINGTON, DE 19801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed cheese spreadACTIVE—
030Frozen sandwichesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 31, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 28, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2014TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 18, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 18, 2014OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 2, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 30, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance