Drawing for TWO HEADED SERVLETS

USPTO serial 85848716

TWO HEADED SERVLETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWO HEADED SERVLETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D.C. Peter Chu, Reg. No. 41,676,

D.C. PETER CHU Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software, recorded on media or downloadable, for the administration and visualization of personal scheduling and contact administration; software for customizing visualization of user profile information; software for customizing visualization of videos; software for customizing visualization of images; software for customizing visualization of information administration, spreadsheets, tables, graphs, charts, word processing, presentations, electronic mail, instant messages, calendar, meeting scheduling, desktop publishing, project administration, customer administration, business planning, direct mail, business financial administration, on-line document collaboration, and storage; software for customizing visualization of a three dimensional model; software for customizing visualization based on a user's biometricsACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing search engines for customizing information displayed to users on a global computer network; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of user interface; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in the field of user interface; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for customizing information displayed to users over the internet and online sources for user interface customization; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for distributing pieces of shared, concurrently accessed non-downloadable temporary-use software for customizing visualization of electronic mail contents; software for the administration and visualization of personal scheduling and contact administrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 9, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 30, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance