Drawing for AT LAST, WATER THAT MAKES YOUR MOUTH WATER

USPTO serial 85853594

AT LAST, WATER THAT MAKES YOUR MOUTH WATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AT LAST, WATER THAT MAKES YOUR MOUTH WATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori S. Kozak

LORI S. KOZAK BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beverages, namely, drinking water, bottled water, flavored waters, fruit flavored waters, fruit drinks, fruit juices, fruit beverages, non-alcoholic cocktail mixes, non-alcoholic beverages with tea or fruit flavors, non-alcoholic aperitifs; preparations for making beverages, namely, flavored waters, fruit flavored waters; aerated waters, seltzer watersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 17, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 23, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 19, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 15, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 17, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance