USPTO serial 85857309
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New Flyer Industries Canada ULC
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARQUARDT, Matthew J.
MARQUARDT, MATTHEW J. DICKINSON WRIGHT LLP199 BAY STREETCOMMERCE COURT WEST, SUITE 2200TORONTO, ONTARIO, M5L1G4| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Parts and components for passenger buses, namely, bus bodies and body panels; fenders for vehicles and bumpers for land vehicles; chassis for motor vehicles; seats, for land vehicles comprising passenger and driver seats; interior and exterior passenger and driver steps, namely, steps for attachment to land vehicles; wheel suspensions and suspension struts; power steering pumps; motor car doors; vehicle windows, windshields, and mirrors comprising interior and exterior rearview and side view mirrors; wipers and wiper motors; bus floor panels; engine bug hoods and side splash and dust shields as structural parts of vehicles; brakes for vehicles; turn signals for vehicles; steering wheels for vehicles; vehicle hood vents; engines for land vehicles; brakes for land vehicles; brake drums; brake shoes for land vehicles; brake mounting hardware for vehicles; brake linings for land vehicles, brake camshafts for land vehicles; brake seals for vehicles; brake slack adjuster for vehicles; brake chambers for vehicle; push rods for engine vehicle parts; axles for land vehicles; axle shafts for land vehicles; land vehicle parts, namely, housing differentials; vehicle wheels; wheel rims; wheel hubs; gears for vehicles, namely, differential and reduction gears | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2014 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2014 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 28, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |