Drawing for EST

USPTO serial 85886299

EST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel R. Frijouf

DANIEL R. FRIJOUF FRIJOUF, RUST & PYLE, P.A.201 E DAVIS BLVDTAMPA, FL 33606-3728UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical circuitry that removes or eliminates power from electrical appliances, products and devices upon detection of potentially hazardous or undesirable conditions and provides an audible alarm and/or visual indicator upon detection of potentially hazardous or undesirable conditions; electrical surge suppressors; electrical transfer switches; electrical protection devices and circuitry, namely, ground fault circuit interrupters, equipment leakage circuit interrupters, leakage current detection interrupters, residual current devices and portable residual current devices; safety circuitry for power monitoring, control and protection of electrical distribution systems and devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 20, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 1, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 11, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 26, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 19, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 11, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance