Drawing for RAPIDFIT

USPTO serial 85896879

RAPIDFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAPIDFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phillip Bennett

Phillip Bennett EIP US LLP2468 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 200San Diego, CA 92106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use in the design and manufacture of customized jigs for controlling the location and/or motion of other tools in the field of manufacturing and fixtures for holding or supporting work pieces in the field of manufacturing; software for use in quality control in the field of manufacturing; process development software for use in the field of manufacturingACTIVE
040Custom manufacturing of jigs for controlling the location and/or motion of other tools in the field of manufacturing, and custom manufacturing of fixtures for holding or supporting work pieces in the field of manufacturing; research in the field of manufacturing process development; industrial research services in the field of manufacturing process development; providing information and advice on manufacturing process developmentACTIVE
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; graphic design; design services in the field of manufacturing process development; design, development, implementation, adaptation, updating and maintenance of software; consulting services in the nature of analysis of 3D models of industrial parts in the field of manufacturing process development for quality control purposes; consulting services in the nature of analysis and calibration for design purposes of jigs for controlling the location and/or motion of other tools in the field of manufacturing; consulting services in the nature of analysis and calibration for design purposes of fixtures for holding or supporting work pieces in the field of manufacturing; customized design of jigs for controlling the location and/or motion of other tools in the field of manufacturing; customized design of fixtures for holding or supporting work pieces in the field of manufacturing; customized design of quality control solutions for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 5, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 6, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 21, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 7, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 20, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 7, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 17, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 17, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 17, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 8, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 8, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 8, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 27, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 27, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2013AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Apr 17, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 13, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Apr 12, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 9, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance