Drawing for CRAZY CHARLIE BAHAMAS

USPTO serial 85899780

CRAZY CHARLIE BAHAMAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRAZY CHARLIE BAHAMAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

GARY A HECHT FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP2000 MARKET STREET20TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, tops, t-shirts, shirts, dresses, shorts, pants, jeans, sweaters, jackets; headwear; footwearACTIVE—
028Fishing lures, Fishing equipment, namely, clamps for securing fishing equipment on body, winging material for fishing jigs and streamers and fishing lure retriever; Fishing rods; Fishing rod racks; Fishing rod holders; Fishing rod cases and handles; Fishing flies; Fishing fly boxes; Fly fishing stripper baskets; Fishing tackle; Fishing tackle bags; Fishing tackle boxes and containersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 16, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Nov 16, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 16, 2016OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 7, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 2, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 12, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance