Drawing for MESHRADIO

USPTO serial 85905779

MESHRADIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MESHRADIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori S. Kozak

Lori S. Kozak Blakely Sokoloff Taylor Zafman LLP12400 Wilshire Boulevard7th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90025-1040

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications software for connecting mobile phone devices; computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data, information, and audio and video content; computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for wireless content deliveryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 4, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 22, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 14, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 25, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 23, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 23, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance