USPTO serial 85929507
E-DNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-DNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Oakmont, PA
Oakmont, PA
Kingston, NY
Kingston, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Economic consulting and information for the industrial and commercial sectors for planning, organizing, monitoring and carrying out unique and complex projects in different sectors of one or several companies | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fabusuyi Tayo
- Other trademarks owned by Fabusuyi, Olutayo
- Other trademarks owned by Hill Victoria
- Other trademarks owned by Hill Victoria
- Other trademarks owned by Weidemann Tim
- Other trademarks owned by Weidemann, Timothy
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named E-DNA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |