Drawing for HAPPY PUTTERS

USPTO serial 85942086

HAPPY PUTTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HAPPY PUTTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon E. Maki

JON E. MAKI LAW OFFICE OF JON E. MAKI4135 CALLE ISABELINOSAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf equipment, namely, golf putters, golf clubs, golf club heads, golf club shafts, hand grips for golf clubs, golf club inserts, golf tees, head covers for golf clubs, and golf putter coversACTIVEDec 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 6, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 18, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 18, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 18, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 30, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 21, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 21, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 29, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance