USPTO serial 85947918
THE SNEAKY CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE SNEAKY CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
ANDREW D. PRICE VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Peanut butter substitute, namely, no-nut butter; jams; jellies; prepared and frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, seafood, poultry, cheese or vegetables; processed vegetable and bean food bars, namely, snack bars made primarily of vegetables or beans; processed fruit-based food bars, namely, snack bars made primarily of fruit; protein-based, nutrient-dense snack bars; dairy-based beverages; dairy alternative-based beverages; fruit-based food beverages; vegetable-based food beverages; prepared and frozen breakfast entrees consisting primarily of meat, eggs, bacon, potato pancakes, fried potatoes, ham, sausages, vegetables or fruits; apple puree; fruit puree; fruit purees used as ingredients of foods; fruit purees used as ingredients of beverages; tomato puree; vegetable puree; frozen or refrigerated hot dogs; hummus; meatballs; chicken tender kits consisting primarily of bread coating, dipping sauce, chicken seasoning, and vegetable puree; sauces; tomato sauce; pasta sauce; prepared and frozen meals consisting primarily of rice or pasta; bakery products, namely, breads, sweet bakery goods and bakery desserts; processed cereals; ready-to-eat cereals; sandwiches; grain-based snack bars; prepared and frozen breakfast entrees consisting primarily of breakfast sandwiches, breakfast burritos, pancakes, French toast, or waffles; ice cream; cocoa-based beverages; snack bars made primarily of processed oats; snack bars made primarily of processed grains; frozen confections; frozen freezer bars; cookies; popcorn; crackers; pancake mixes; waffle mixes; brownie mixes; cookie mixes; pizza; dipping sauces; pasta; dry pasta; hamburger sandwiches, namely, sliders; dinner kits consisting primarily of taco shells, taco sauce, taco seasoning, and vegetable puree; pasta dinner kits consisting primarily of pasta noodles, pasta sauce, and vegetable puree | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 31, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 20, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |