Drawing for THE KITCHEN

USPTO serial 85969508

THE KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIRANDA, JOHN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

ANDREW ROPPEL HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant servicesACTIVEMar 16, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 1, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 1, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 17, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 24, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 24, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 21, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 21, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 21, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 21, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 20, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance