USPTO serial 86002526
BEAUTY WITH INTEGRITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAUTY WITH INTEGRITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
C.P. 01730 MEXICO CITY, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla C Calcagno
Carla Calcagno CALCAGNO LAW PLLC1250 24th St., N.W., Suite 300WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, fruit pickers (hand tool), meat choppers, milling cutters; Furniture, frames (picture), mirrors, magazine racks, armchairs, cabinets (furniture), furniture shelves, racks (furniture), trays not of metal; Household or kitchen utensils and containers, unworked or semi-worked glass (except glass used in building), glassware, candelabra not of precious metal, ice buckets, ceramics for household purposes, fruit cups, egg cups, dish covers, butter dishes (not of precious metals), drinking vessels, flower pots, knife rests for the table, liqueur sets, napkin holders, not of precious metals, tea services; Retail store services, namely online and brick and mortar retail store services, featuring furniture, picture frames, mirrors, magazine racks, armchairs, furniture cabinets, furniture shelves, furniture racks, trays not of metal, household and kitchen utensils and containers, unworked or semi-worked glass (except glass used in building), glassware, candelabra not of precious metal, ice buckets, ceramics for household purposes, fruit cups, egg cups, dish covers, butter dishes (not of precious metals), drinking vessels, flower pots, knife rests for the table, liqueur sets, napkin holders (not of precious metals); tea services; and cutlery, fruit pickers, meat choppers, and milling cutters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |