Drawing for VIDEO.JS

USPTO serial 86016052

VIDEO.JS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEO.JS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian L. Saffer

Ian L. Saffer Kilpatrick Towsend & Stockton LLP1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software, namely, video transmission software that facilitates the online delivery of movies, television programs and other video content for others over public and private computer networksACTIVEMay 18, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2015PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Dec 1, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 17, 2014TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 14, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 15, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 15, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance