USPTO serial 86046909
GARDNER, REALTORS, EXQUISITE HOMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GARDNER, REALTORS, EXQUISITE HOMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas S. Keaty
THOMAS S. KEATY KEATY LAW FIRM365 CANAL ST STE 2410NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-1144UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising of commercial and residential real estate; providing real estate leads for prospective purchasers; real estate marketing services, namely, online services featuring the promotion of residential and commercial real estate; real estate auctions; matching consumers with real estate professionals in the field of real estate services via computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2015 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |