Drawing for MYSTREAM

USPTO serial 86106272

MYSTREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYSTREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald R. Naylor, Jr.

DONALD R. NAYLOR, JR. AIR LIQUIDE USA LLC2700 POST OAK BLVD STE 325HOUSTON, TX 77056-5737UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the manufacture of semiconductors, solar cells, light emitting diodes, flat screens and batteries, namely, installations for mixing gases and chemicals for the manufacture of semiconductors, solar cells, light emitting diodes, flat screens and batteriesACTIVE—
011Installations for the production, distribution and purification of gases and chemicals for the manufacture of semiconductors, photovoltaic cells, light emitting diodes, flat screens and batteries, namely, dryers used for the removal of solid, liquid and vapor contaminants from compressed air and gasesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 25, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 9, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance