Drawing for ALLTEC PROTECTION PYRAMID

USPTO serial 86111947

ALLTEC PROTECTION PYRAMID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ALLTEC PROTECTION PYRAMID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Madayag

ROBERT A. MADAYAG LEE & HAYES, PLLC601 W. Riverside Ave.Suite 1400Spokane, WA 99201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011a comprehensive three-tier facility approach for lightning protection using lightning protection equipment, namely charge dissipation terminals, early streamer emission terminals, lightning strike counters, conventional air terminals and bases, lightning protection conductors, and component parts therefore sold as a unit, surge suppression using surge suppression equipment, namely, surge suppressors and transient voltage surge protectors, and grounding solutions, namely, electrolytic ground rods, ground enhancing backfill, grounding and bonding cables, bus bars, ground plates, jumpers, ground and signal reference grids, copper clad and stainless steel ground rods, retractable bonding assemblies consisting primarily of electric conductive cable and clamp and component parts therefor sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 23, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 25, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance