Drawing for NVM

USPTO serial 86113455

NVM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NVM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta L. Christensen

ROBERTA L. CHRISTENSEN KOLEY JESSEN P.C., L.L.O.1125 S 103RD ST STE 800OMAHA, NE 68124-1079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely, network-based contact centers services; e-mail services; remote data access services, namely, provision of access to data or documents stored electronically in central files for remote consultation; provision of access via the Internet, VPN and telephone to an application hub, the application hub providing integration of computer telephony, web, e-mail, chat, SMS and other communications methods whereby people who wish to communicate with the customer are put into contact via the application hub; provision of access via the Internet and telephone to an application hub, the application hub enabling person-to-person, business-to-business and customer-to-business contact in multiple media formats with applications comprising at least one of the services of voice processing, call recording, message archival, call routing of communications, speech recognition, speech and text analytics, biometrics, interactive voice response, lie detection, stress analysis, data processing and collection, credit card transaction, telephony, conferencing, video, word spotting, instant messaging, web chat, forecasting, scheduling, rostering, training, coaching, quality management, call scripting, analytics, workforce management, workforce optimization, knowledge management, semantic analysis, topic extraction, machine learning, mobile services and web services, whereby people who wish to communicate with the customer are put into contact via the application hub; provision of access via the Internet, VPN and telephone to an application hub, the application hub providing the processing facilities of a call or contact centerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 29, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 29, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 17, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance